Stack Influence vs Tubular Labs: Which Is Better? (2026 Comparison)
Stack Influence is a micro-influencer platform built for e-commerce brands seeking cost-effective, product-only creator campaigns. In contrast, Tubular Labs is an enterprise-grade social video intelligence tool designed for media companies and large agencies needing deep, cross-platform audience metrics. If you are comparing these two, you likely need to decide between Stack Influence alternatives for campaign execution or Tubular Labs alternatives for high-level data analysis.
| Feature | Stack Influence | Tubular Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Content Discovery | ||
UGC Discovery | 4/5 | 2/5 |
Brand Mention Detection | 2/5 | 3/5 |
Untagged Content Detection | 2/5 | 1/5 |
| Video Tracking | ||
Short-Form Video Tracking | 3/5 | 4/5 |
| Creator Management | ||
Creator Analytics | 3/5 | 5/5 |
Rights Management | 3/5 | 1/5 |
| Intelligence & AI | ||
Competitor Intelligence | 1/5 | 4/5 |
AI Content Tagging | 2/5 | 5/5 |
| Platform & Integrations | ||
Multi-Platform Support | 4/5 | 4/5 |
Integrations | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Reporting & Collaboration | ||
Reporting Dashboards | 3/5 | 4/5 |
Team Collaboration | 2/5 | 3/5 |
API Access | 2/5 | 4/5 |
| Usability & Support | ||
Ease of Use | 4/5 | 2/5 |
Customer Support | 4/5 | 3/5 |
Feature Deep Dive
Comparing Stack Influence and Tubular Labs is a study in two very different methodologies. Stack Influence (4/5 for UGC discovery) focuses on the execution of micro-influencer campaigns. It allows brands to connect with 11M+ vetted creators who accept product-only compensation. This makes it a powerhouse for Amazon and D2C sellers who need a steady stream of word-of-mouth buzz. However, if you are looking for a Stack Influence alternative with deeper social listening, you might find its basic reporting (3/5) a bit restrictive.
Tubular Labs (4/5 for creator analytics) operates at the enterprise level. It doesn't help you send products to influencers; instead, it analyzes 15 billion videos across 40 million creators to provide global video measurement. Tubular's ContentGraph AI (5/5 for AI tagging) categorizes content into over 1 million categories, providing the kind of competitive intelligence (4/5) that Stack Influence (1/5) lacks entirely. If your goal is to understand how your brand's video performance compares to the BBC or Netflix, Tubular is the standard. If you want to see how Tubular compares to other heavy hitters, check out the Brandwatch vs Tubular Labs breakdown.
When it comes to rights management, Stack Influence provides basic tools (3/5) because their model is built on product gifting and post-reimbursement. Tubular Labs (1/5) offers virtually no support for usage rights, as its focus is on measurement rather than asset acquisition. For brands that need to repurpose influencer content for ads, comparing Archive vs Stack Influence may reveal a better fit for content library management.
In terms of video tracking, Tubular Labs handles 5 major platforms including YouTube and Twitch with unified metrics. Stack Influence is more localized to the creators within its network. For teams managing diverse creator platforms, the Collabstr vs Stack Influence comparison highlights different ways to manage multi-platform creator relationships. Ultimately, Tubular Labs offers the breadth of data, while Stack Influence offers the simplicity of campaign execution.
| Plan Details | Stack Influence | Tubular Labs |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing Model | Usage Based | Custom |
| Free Tier | ||
| Free Trial | 14 days | |
| Pricing Tiers | ||
| Entry Tier | Pay-per-PostCustom | Plus$1,500/mo |
| Mid Tier | Campaign PackageCustom | Premium$3,500/mo |
| Top Tier | — | EnterpriseCustom |
| Annual Cost (5-Person Team)* | Contact Sales | $18,000 |
| Hidden Costs |
|
|
* Annual cost calculated using entry tier pricing. Per-seat pricing multiplied by 5 users. Actual costs may vary based on specific plan and usage.
The pricing models for these two tools could not be more different. Stack Influence uses a usage-based model with no upfront SaaS fees. You pay $39 per successful post, plus the cost of the product you are gifting. For a 5-person marketing team running a campaign of 200 micro-influencer posts per year, the total cost of ownership would be approximately $7,800, plus the wholesale cost of the 200 products. This makes it highly accessible for brands testing the waters, though costs can scale quickly if you aim for high volume. You can see how this compares to other entry-level tools in our ShortsIntel vs Stack Influence pricing guide.
Tubular Labs is an enterprise-level investment. Their entry-tier 'Plus' plan starts at $1,500/month ($18,000/year), while the 'Premium' tier jumps to $3,500/month ($42,000/year). Because Tubular uses seat-based pricing, a 5-person team would likely need an Enterprise custom quote, which can easily exceed $50,000 annually when factoring in API access and specialized consulting. For smaller teams, searching for a Tubular Labs alternative is often the first step when they see the initial quote.
While Stack Influence offers better value for D2C brands focused on volume and execution, Tubular Labs provides the kind of macro-level data that justifies its cost for media giants and global agencies. If your budget is somewhere in the middle, comparing Archive vs Tubular Labs might show a more balanced approach between data and cost.
Who Is Each Product Best For?
Micro influencer marketing platform using product-only compensation to connect e-commerce brands with vetted micro-influencers
Best For
- E-commerce and D2C brands
- Amazon sellers
- Brands with products suitable for gifting
- Companies testing micro-influencer marketing
- Brands wanting pay-for-performance
- Companies seeking word-of-mouth buzz
Not Ideal For
- Brands working with macro/celebrity influencers
- Companies needing social listening
- Teams requiring competitive intelligence
- Brands without physical products to gift
- Companies needing cash-based influencer payments
- High-volume needs (costs scale quickly)
Social video intelligence and analytics platform — cross-platform video measurement, creator benchmarking, audience insights, and trending content discovery across YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitch
Best For
- Enterprise media companies needing cross-platform video measurement
- Broadcasters and publishers benchmarking video performance at scale
- Brands requiring audience intelligence across social video platforms
- Agencies comparing creator performance across 40M+ accounts
- Market research teams analyzing video content trends and categories
- Ad sales teams using video data to inform partnership decisions
Not Ideal For
- Small businesses and individual creators (enterprise pricing)
- Teams needing UGC tracking and content rights management
- Brands focused specifically on short-form video analytics
- Companies wanting transparent, self-serve pricing
- Teams needing quick setup without enterprise onboarding
- Organizations requiring text-based social listening beyond video
Choose Stack Influence if you are an e-commerce or Amazon brand with a physical product that is easily giftable. It is the ideal choice for teams that want a pay-for-performance model and don't have the time to manually vet thousands of micro-influencers. If your primary goal is generating UGC for your product pages at a predictable cost, Stack Influence is a strong contender. You can explore more options in the Stack Influence alternatives list if you need cash-based payments instead of product-only deals.
Choose Tubular Labs if you are a large media brand, broadcaster, or global agency that needs to benchmark video performance across entire social ecosystems. If you need to know which content trends are moving the needle on YouTube or Facebook and how your audience behavior compares to your competitors, Tubular's 10 years of historical data is unmatched. For those in high-stakes ad sales or market research, the enterprise cost is a necessary investment in data accuracy. See how it stacks up in our ShortsIntel vs Tubular Labs comparison.
Neither might be right if you are a B2C brand specifically focused on short-form video (TikTok, Reels, Shorts) and you need to track content that mentions your brand without tagging you. Stack Influence only tracks what its own influencers post, and Tubular Labs' TikTok coverage has historically been less robust than its YouTube data. If you need automated rights management for repurposing video content into ads, you might be better off looking at a CreatorIQ alternative or a specialized social listening tool like Brandwatch vs Stack Influence.
Consider a Third Option
Scale creator marketing with data, not grunt work.
If Stack Influence feels too limited to its own creator network and Tubular Labs feels too expensive and complex, ShortsIntel offers a powerful middle ground. While Tubular Labs tracks 40M+ creators at a macro level, ShortsIntel specializes in deep social listening for short-form video (TikTok, Instagram Reels, and YouTube Shorts). Unlike Stack Influence, which relies on creators tagging you correctly, ShortsIntel uses AI to detect brand mentions in audio and visual elements, even when you aren't tagged. This helps brands capture up to 30% more UGC than traditional tools.
ShortsIntel also solves the biggest weakness of Tubular Labs: rights management. While Tubular tells you how a video is performing, ShortsIntel provides a 'magic-link' consent system that lets you legally secure the rights to that content for your own ad campaigns. This makes it an excellent Tubular Labs alternative for brands that want to turn data into usable assets.
When comparing ShortsIntel vs Stack Influence, the difference lies in control. Stack Influence is a platform for running campaigns with their creators; ShortsIntel is a tool for monitoring the entire short-form landscape to find what people are already saying about you. With pricing starting at just $99/month, it provides a professional-grade solution for DTC brands that have outgrown basic tracking but aren't ready for enterprise-level contracts. For a full breakdown of how it fits into your stack, see our ShortsIntel vs Tubular Labs page or browse other ShortsIntel comparisons.
Why Choose ShortsIntel
- Purpose-built for short-form video (TikTok, Reels, Shorts) unlike general social listening tools
- Detects untagged content that competitors miss (claims 30% more coverage)
- AI-powered content tagging analyzes videos frame-by-frame for format, visual elements, and trends
- Automated rights management with magic-link consent system and audit trails
Best For
Starting at $99/mo
7-day free trial
Full Comparison: All Three Options
| Feature | Stack Influence | Tubular Labs | ShortsIntel Recommended |
|---|---|---|---|
| Content Discovery | |||
UGC Discovery | 4/5 | 2/5 | 5/5 |
Brand Mention Detection | 2/5 | 3/5 | 5/5 |
Untagged Content Detection | 2/5 | 1/5 | 5/5 |
| Video Tracking | |||
Short-Form Video Tracking | 3/5 | 4/5 | 5/5 |
| Creator Management | |||
Creator Analytics | 3/5 | 5/5 | 4/5 |
Rights Management | 3/5 | 1/5 | 5/5 |
| Intelligence & AI | |||
Competitor Intelligence | 1/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 |
AI Content Tagging | 2/5 | 5/5 | 5/5 |
| Platform & Integrations | |||
Multi-Platform Support | 4/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 |
Integrations | 3/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
| Reporting & Collaboration | |||
Reporting Dashboards | 3/5 | 4/5 | 4/5 |
Team Collaboration | 2/5 | 3/5 | 3/5 |
API Access | 2/5 | 4/5 | 3/5 |
| Usability & Support | |||
Ease of Use | 4/5 | 2/5 | 4/5 |
Customer Support | 4/5 | 3/5 | 4/5 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Ready to try ShortsIntel?
Track UGC, discover creators, and monitor brand mentions across TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube Shorts.
Related Comparisons
More About stack-influence-vs-tubularlabs
Similar Tools in Influencer Marketing
Popular Comparisons
Last updated: January 30, 2026